In the Blogosphere
Thursday: Something Happening In Pittsburgh
##
Commission Chairwoman Wrenna Watson said Mr. Reidbord was present for all of an earlier hearing Dec. 11 where the master plan and CBA were discussed. She said much of the testimony at the Jan. 14 hearing was repetitive. "So he really did have the information to make an informed decision," she said. (P-G, Mark Belko)
#1 How did he know the testimony was going to be repetitive when he left?
#2 Hey, can we see the minutes from that meeting so we can judge for ourselves?
#3 Maybe the testimony would have been a little less repetitive if sixteen amendments to the Master Plan were presented by city planning before the public comment period, instead of immediately after?
#4 Since you voted "with the community" and against the master plan, Chairwoman Watson, why didn't you ask a single follow-up question of our City Solicitor? Why didn't any of the rest of the no-votes ask questions? What a missed opportunity.
##